51 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
Summary
Chapter Summaries & Analyses
Key Figures
Themes
Symbols & Motifs
Important Quotes
Essay Topics
Tools
Woodfox opens Chapter 27 with a description of life in a concrete prison, which was always noisy because of the constant din of people conversing through the pipes, breaking down in their cells, or arguing. Despite the noise, Woodfox was alone, and locked in a cell for 23 hours a day. While Woodfox had strategies to deal with the isolation—including keeping his cell clean and exercising as much as possible—he notes that the experience was sometimes unbearable for other prisoners, who had come into solitary confinement already burdened by their life experiences and the overall violence of prison.
While the monotony of solitary confinement was part of the challenge, Woodfox writes that any disruption to the routine was also destabilizing, as something as small as breakfast being delivered 15 minutes late served to remind inmates how little control they had over their lives.
Meanwhile, Woodfox writes, he, Wallace and King had been forgotten by the outside world, including the Black Panther Party, which stopped operations in the 1980s.
He and other inmates were also dealing with the indifference of medical professionals. For the most part, medical issues at Angola were treated with aspirin, Woodfox says. After prisoners filed lawsuits claiming the lack of care constituted a violation of constitutional rights, the prison allowed inmates to see doctors, but many avoided going, because doing so meant they could be written up by prison officials for “malingering.” The poor conditions contributed to chronic illnesses too—in Woodfox’s case, diabetes and Hepatitis C.
In Chapter 29, Woodfox describes the impossibility of getting out of the conditions of solitary confinement he’d described; although the federal government required that inmates in solitary confinement have their status reviewed every 90 days, Woodfox, Wallace, and King’s isolation was renewed every time. As late as 2008, the prison’s warden said he wouldn’t let Woodfox out because he thought Woodfox would “organize the young new inmates” (192). In Chapter 30, Woodfox describes how, despite the hopelessness of the situation, his friendship with Wallace and King, both of whom had also grown up facing racism and poverty, kept him strong and dedicated to the cause of improving conditions in the prison. Their friendship was also a rare example of a kind and trusting relationship, as, for the most part, “prison teaches you that most acts of kindness have strings attached; something in return will be expected at some point and what is expected might be conduct you find appalling, a violation of your moral code and system of values” (199).
In the 1980s, thanks to Woodfox’s legal work, prisoners were granted contact visits. As part of the William Hayes consent decree, Louisiana prisons had been ordered by the federal government to improve conditions, including allowing contact visits. In his research, Woodfox discovered the prison officials had hidden this fact from the inmates and filed a complaint. When contact visits were finally granted—Woodfox’s first contact visit in 15 years—he writes he wasn’t sure how to act: “I didn’t feel comfortable. I had forgotten what it felt like to be physically close to people” (205).
Woodfox closes this section by describing the internal changes he underwent as he moved into his forties, even as his surroundings stayed the same. Over the course of 15 years in solitary confinement, he’d developed a strong moral compass, served as a mentor and leader to other prisoners, and nurtured a sense of compassion for those around him, including his mother. Ultimately, Woodfox concludes, he’d grown as a person—growth being an essential element of human life, but one that is often derailed by fear.
Woodfox opens Chapter 33 describing watching the televised moment where Nelson Mandela walked out of prison in 1990, after 27 years behind bars. Mandela, who’d been arrested for resisting apartheid in South Africa, was a source of inspiration throughout Woodfox’s time in solitary confinement. Woodfox began a renewed attempt to end his own unjust confinement; because a court had never ruled on Woodfox’s motion to quash the grand jury indictment of him for killing Angola prison guard Brent Miller (on the grounds that the jury contained no minorities or women and was therefore unconstitutional), Woodfox was successful in obtaining a new trial, although it would take six years for that trial to actually occur.
In the meantime, Woodfox was devastated by the loss of his mother, in 1994. His mother, Ruby Edwards, had persevered through great hardship, Woodfox writes, including growing up in the Jim Crow south, where black people were subject to constant oppression and disrespect, and having to fight Woodfox’s biological family for custody of her son. When she died, Woodfox only found out through a letter of condolence from Herman Wallace: “one of the cruelties of being in prison is that you are always the last to know what’s going on in your own family” (222). Woodfox was further hurt when the warden of the prison denied his request to attend his mother’s funeral, even though it was custom at the prison for inmates to be allowed to do so.
In Chapter 35, Woodfox returns to the preparations for his retrial for the murder of Brent Miller. Among other discoveries, Woodfox and his lawyers found that prison officials had paid one of the witnesses, Hezekiah Brown, who’d testified for the prosecution, with cigarettes. They also discovered letters from the warden asking a judge to support a pardon for that inmate.
In August 1996, Woodfox was released from Angola, having served half of his 50-year original sentence—for armed robbery—and taken to another jail, where he’d be held while awaiting his retrial for the murder of Brent Miller, but not before having to walk past members of Brent Miller’s family, who were waiting at the gate of Angola, threatening to kill him.
At the new institution, Amite City Jail, Woodfox was once again in solitary confinement and held in a cell 23 hours a day. Eventually he was moved into a part of a jail in which he was housed for other inmates, mostly Cubans, whom he assisted with their letters and immigration paperwork. In this section, the doors of cells were open all day. After 24 years, Woodfox writes that being able to move around freely outside of a cell, and to have people moving around him, was “unnerving at first” (232). Though he came to adjust to the increased mobility, he didn’t let down his guard around other inmates, many of whom only stayed in the wing a short time before being moved elsewhere.
Years passed, and finally Woodfox’s trial was set to take place in November 1998. In the lead up to the trial, his case had drawn the attention of Scott Fleming, a law student, and Malik Rahim, a former Panther Woodfox had met while they were incarcerated together at Orleans Parish Prison. Together, they drew attention to Woodfox’s upcoming trial, raising awareness in a way Woodfox had hoped on previous occasions would happen, but had been disappointed. This time, a network of former Panther’s mobilized to follow Woodfox’s trial closely, and Woodfox went into the proceedings feeling hopeful.
But once the trial began, Woodfox writes that he quickly realized his lawyers were outmatched by the prosecution, who told jurors that Woodfox had killed Brent Miller out of hatred for white people, and that his connection to the Black Panthers was proof of that hatred, and tried to confuse the jurors’ about a bloody fingerprint left at the scene on the day of the murder, which didn’t match Woodfox, by calling it a partial palm print and failing to notify Woodfox’s lawyers about the palm print theory before the trial. In turn, Woodfox was frustrated that his lawyers had not found all three potential alibi witnesses to testify in Woodfox’s defense and had not consulted forensic experts who could have helped with the case. But despite that frustration—and the guilty verdict the jury ultimately delivered—Woodfox ends the chapter remembering what he’d said in an interview after the verdict: he had no regrets.
In the final chapter of this section, Woodfox returned to Angola as prisoners in the solitary confinement unit, CCR, were preparing to begin a hunger strike over increasingly strict conditions. For their involvement in the strike, Woodfox, Wallace, and King were sent to Camp J, the prison’s punishment unit, where they were held in their cells 23 hours and 45 minutes a day, and released only for showers, were denied reading material, and had little access to exercise. Though prisoners were supposed to be released after six months, guards had discretion to hold prisoners in the unit almost indefinitely, which amounted to “severe psychological torture” (254).
Woodfox closes the section by describing a new legal strategy, an appeal of his conviction on the grounds that the state had withheld evidence that the witness, Hezekiah Brown, had been paid, and on the grounds that the grand jury had been improperly selected—a case, Woodfox ends by noting, could go all the way to federal court.
In these chapters, Woodfox continues to develop the major themes of the book, and devotes some chapters to explaining how certain parts of the prison system functioned—including medical care, shakedowns, and contact visits—both as illustrations of his commitment to enacting change in the prison and as a narrative device painting a fuller picture of life inside the institution. Throughout these anecdotes, the reader is also given greater inside into Woodfox’s relationship with Robert King and Herman Wallace and their devotion to each other and to revolutionary struggle.
Chapter 27 opens with a description of the monotony and pain of solitary confinement, which Woodfox knew all too well, having spent 10 years in it, by that point. “The pressure of the cell changed most men,” Woodfox writes, noting that some became depressed, others violent and paranoid. In describing the suffering caused by solitary confinement, Woodfox is setting up the discussion that will take place later in the book, of the characterization of solitary confinement as a form of torture, and the interest of psychologists in assessing the mental state of those who, like Woodfox, spent decades in a cell.
At the beginning of these sections, Woodfox is isolated in another way; by the 80s, the Black Panther Party had disbanded, thanks to the actions of the FBI’s Counterintelligence Program, or COINTELPRO, which had infiltrated the party and sown division, murdered or incarcerated leaders, and provided false information about the party to law enforcement and the media. Meanwhile, the public had moved on, and advocacy organizations showed little interested in Woodfox, Wallace, and King’s plight. While frustrating, this also cemented their bond: “we became our own means of inspiration to one another” (184). Through this bond, they found the determination required to continue to advocate for improvements to conditions, such as fighting for contact visits for prisoners in solitary confinement. However, this advocacy also ensured they were kept in solitary confinement. As proof of this, Woodfox cites a 2008 statement by the Warden, noting that Woodfox had to be kept in his cell because he was a Black Panther who would organize the inmates if allowed to join the general population of the prison.
In these chapters, Woodfox also describes his maturation, as he moved into his forties. This included emotional growth, including the development of a strong moral compass and a commitment to teach other prisoners to value and respect themselves as he had done, as well as intellectual development, in terms of Woodfox’s growing understanding of the law. That education helped Woodfox find a way forward in his case: having his original indictment for the murder of Brent Miller thrown own, out the basis of ineffective counsel in his first trial. Another trial was ordered, which took place in 1998.
In the course of describing this second trial, Woodfox further explores another important theme in the book: that of systemic racism in the justice system. From the beginning, Woodfox writes that the process was marked by prejudice, including the presence, on the grand jury that would decide whether or not to reindict Woodfox, of the wife of Angola’s warden at the time of Brent Miller’s murder. This woman presented false and inflammatory account of Miller’s death, and Woodfox’s involvement in it, but the judge allowed the jury’s reindictment of Woodfox to stand. Then, through descriptions and transcripts of witness examinations, Woodfox describes how, in the trial itself, Woodfox faced underhanded tactics from the prosecutor, Julie Cullen, who told jurors that Woodfox had killed Miller out of hatred for white people and found ways to bring up evidence the judge had ruled inadmissible. Ultimately, much of the trial hinged on fears about the Black Panther Party, echoing the feelings that had prompted government crackdown on the party in the 60s and 70s. Woodfox writes that his lawyers were also underprepared and outmatched by the resources the state had devoted to the prosecution, hinting at another element of institutional racism: the state was willing to devote almost limitless resources to keeping Woodfox in jail, resources which Woodfox, even at his most well-supported and defended, was scarcely able to match, and which would have been well beyond the reach of the average prisoner.
The section ends with further evidence of Woodfox’s tenacity and commitment to principles. After being convicted a second time of the murder of Brent Miller, he was sent back to solitary confinement at Angola. While Woodfox had been away for his trial, conditions had grown more punitive. After starting a hunger strike in protest, he, Wallace, and King were sent to Camp J, the prison’s punishment unit. Years later, Woodfox received a letter from a man who had been in the cell beside him, thanking him for serving as a source of kindness and inspiration. By including this letter, Woodfox shows how his commitment to the principles of self-respect and dignity not only helped him survive, but also inspired those around him.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features: