48 pages • 1 hour read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more. For select classroom titles, we also provide Teaching Guides with discussion and quiz questions to prompt student engagement.
Nature is personified as a feminine presence in Emerson’s essay. This portrayal fits in with the classical tradition of applying the pronoun “she” to nature, in addition to the fact that nature is gendered feminine in the romance languages of classical texts. Fecund nature, which was full of material forms, was regarded as the feminine opposite to God and the intellect. Emerson employs maternal allusions to his discussion of this source of bounty, as he describes a “child’s love” for his “beautiful mother.” The love of a child for his mother is instinctive, complete, and irrational. He views her through a rose-tinted, potentially distorted lens. Just as 19th-century education separated boys from their mothers to encourage them to disidentify with the feminine sphere and become more manly, Emerson wants to gain enough distance from the surface sensorial characteristics of nature to enter the more masculine realm of its intellectual and spiritual significance.
Emerson’s text abounds in similes and metaphors, which use comparisons to distance the reader enough from everyday phenomena to see them anew. For example, Emerson uses metaphor to support his argument that the present age deserves its own philosophy when he questions why “we grope among the dry bones of the past, or put the living generation into masquerade out of its faded wardrobe” when “the sun shines to-day also” (15). Here, the dim, abject imagery of dry bones and worn, faded clothing juxtaposes with the brilliant light of today’s sun, as Emerson encourages the reader to seek wonder in the bright contemporary rather than the obsolete past. The most explicit use of metaphor is when Emerson claims that “the whole of nature is a metaphor of the human mind” (32), as its processes of discipline and hierarchy echo those of the intellect. The idea of metaphor is important to Emerson’s argument, as it encourages the reader to appreciate nature beyond its sensuous surface.
Although Emerson complains at the excessive retrospection of his age and argues that contemporary philosophy should replace the classical tradition, he still makes references to the classical world—for example, to the pagan wind god Aeolus and the philosopher Plato’s allegory of the cave. Still, in both cases Emerson makes the allusion to prove its relative irrelevance to the current age. While human ingenuity has made steamships more powerful than any classical personification of the wind, Plato’s questioning of the natural world’s reality is a mere “noble doubt” that can be dismissed as tangential to Emerson’s inquiry (41). While Emerson makes allusions to show that he has been schooled in the classical tradition, he practices what he preaches when he refuses to put them before his own experience and intuition.
A striking feature of Emerson’s style is its assertiveness and confidence. His convictions are often conveyed with anecdotal evidence, as he relies heavily on his personal experiences and intuitions to make his argument. He makes universalizing statements such as:
the tradesman, the attorney comes out of the din and craft of the street, and sees the sky and the woods, and is a man again. In their eternal calm, he finds himself. The health of the eye seems to demand a horizon. We are never tired, so long as we can see far enough (22).
Emerson not only personally experiences the woods as a restorative relief from the irritating bustle of the town, but also automatically assumes that this is the case for others. These others are variously referred to as men of different professions and in a direct address to the reader, whom he incorporates into a “we.” The “eye” image, which acts as a metaphor for the psyche, is also deployed as an aid to the notion of a universal experience of nature, given that most humans have a pair of seeing eyes (22). In Emerson’s age, which set store by intuition and the search for a whole to define and encompass every part, anecdotal evidence and universalizing motifs strengthened an argument. However, modern readers might find these same tendencies problematic because they do not account for differences in experience based on gender, class, and race. Rather than being wholly carried along with the notion of Emerson’s universal reader, those who perceive the world differently are further excluded.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By Ralph Waldo Emerson
American Literature
View Collection
Beauty
View Collection
Books & Literature
View Collection
Essays & Speeches
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Required Reading Lists
View Collection
School Book List Titles
View Collection
Science & Nature
View Collection
Transcendentalism
View Collection