65 pages • 2 hours read
A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.
hooks begins this essay with the claim that the feminist movement has helped white women and not Black women. hooks gives examples of Black women who spoke out against sexism during the cases against US Supreme Court justice Clarence Thomas and boxer Mike Tyson, warning against “the development of black patriarchy” where Black women’s voices are not included in social justice movements (63). She describes how straight Black male activists focus on manhood, while gay Black men, like Joseph Beam and Essex Hemphill, dedicate themselves to dismantling patriarchy.
hooks examines Paul Gilroy’s claim about masculinity, arguing that Black men who gain power in capitalism seek to dominate Black women. Their participation in the patriarchy does not improve the lives of Black people as a whole. hooks continues to quote Gilroy’s argument that racial integrity is linked with Black manhood. She adds that masculinity should be redefined outside of patriarchy.
Then, hooks suggests moving away from a benevolent patriarchal structure and toward a model where gender does not make one stronger or smarter, arguing that both men and women should have a sense of self. hooks describes how her brother was pressured to be a man, which entailed being responsible rather than having fun. Instead, hooks argues that pleasure and accountability should work together to lead to self-actualization.
hooks challenges the model of the patriarchal family. She disagrees with Gilroy, who does not see family life as “a location of redemption” (71), and argues that it can be if the family is not patriarchal. Black mothers have insisted that their male children act in a patriarchal fashion, as protectors and providers. hooks advocates instead for progressive and non-authoritarian familial structures. In opposition to Hitler, who interprets the family as a mini-nation, hooks argues that love, not domination, should be what structures families. Love-centered relationships include negotiation, sharing, processing, and cooperation. Moreover, abolishing the patriarchal family structure, says hooks, is necessary for ending domestic abuse.
Next, hooks quotes John Stoltenberg about men valuing manhood over justice. He discusses how men seek approval of their manhood from other men. hooks argues that always prioritizing bonds between men over relationships with women is part of patriarchal power. Black women and men must “have the freedom to be self-determining” (75). She calls for men who challenge the patriarchy to make their voices heard so other men will follow in their path. Challenging sexism is necessary to instill hope in Black women.
hooks begins by quoting Ida B. Wells on the defamation of Black women, adding that the “[d]evaluation of Black womanhood is central to the maintenance of white supremacist capitalist patriarchy” (78). hooks states that Black women have challenged both racism and sexism and Black men consider women who speak out about sexism to be race traitors. The media further perpetuates stereotypes of Black women regarding their sexual and immoral nature. hooks cites the example of Anita Hill, who was defamed during the Clarence Thomas hearings, and the instance where former President Clinton insisted Joycelyn Elders resign as surgeon general.
Then, hooks focuses on media by Black men, such as Orlando Patterson, who argues that feminism is detrimental to the Black community. He and others believe that Black men are more important than Black women to the Black liberation movement. hooks discusses the film Sankofa, in which a Black woman has to redeem her betrayal by submitting to a Black man. Various media outlets like The New York Times, as well as President Johnson’s war on poverty campaign during the 1960s, blame Black women for the poverty, unemployment, and violence of Black men.
hooks refers to an anthology called The Coming of Black Genocide, which criticizes Daniel Patrick Moynihan’s participation in the war on poverty and his sexism. hooks then states that the scapegoating of Black women plays a key role in denying them welfare benefits. Single Black mothers, however, often teach their sons “to embrace patriarchal notions of masculinity” because they believe that the capitalist patriarchy is necessary for Black people to succeed (84). hooks calls on her readers to challenge negative perceptions of Black womanhood, even when they come from Black men. She says that Black men who have feminist politics need to call out the sexism of other Black men as well.
hooks observes that, while Black men acknowledge that sexism is an issue in Black communities, they are not motivated to challenge sexism. Rather, they frame their sexism as “an outcome of racist victimization” (86). As an example, hooks quotes Nathan McCall, who argues that Black men subjugate Black women because Black men are subjugated by white people. In response, hooks asserts that some Black men can access power and privilege that Black women cannot. hooks also argues that Black men frame fighting for racial equality as more important than fighting for gender equality and they want Black women to focus on improving the lives of Black men.
Then, hooks argues that white communities respond positively to Black men who only discuss racism in terms of masculinity. Racism, to them, is “unrealized wounded black manhood” (88). hooks points out that the media describing Black men as endangered animals is dehumanizing. Black men who echo this sentiment about manhood reinforce the idea that Black men need to be good patriarchs to survive. In this way, both white and Black men uphold the white supremacist patriarchy.
Next, hooks examines the arguments surrounding schools for only Black boys. These single-gender schools have patriarchal curriculums that focus on the obedience of the students, as well as their discipline. hooks advocates for more liberatory teaching methods that do not focus on control and punishment. She notes that men who succeed in the militaristic schools and succeed in changing their social class treat Black women as inferiors. Black men who have obtained some financial privilege will abuse and dominate Black women, as well as each other. hooks observes that homophobia also plays a large role in Black men rejecting feminist thought.
hooks states that, throughout the feminist movement, Black men have opposed feminism. For example, these men had sexist commentaries about Alice Walker’s work. When hooks published her book in the 1990s, Black men gained the approval of white men by flaunting their heterosexuality. hooks offers the example of rap music that is misogynistic and capitalistic. Sexism must be challenged, argues hooks, in order to dismantle patriarchal thinking. The “anti-feminist perspective is the only voice [...] that most intimately addresses black folks across class” (95). To counter this, more Black men who oppose sexism need to raise their voices. hooks quotes Malcolm X about seeing each other differently. Overcoming sexism will aid all Black folks in obtaining self-determination and redemptive love.
hooks distinguishes between feminism that helps privileged white women and feminism that is revolutionary. White feminists settle for gaining status within the capitalist patriarchy, rather than challenge the system itself. hooks includes the example of how only some white women in women’s studies programs have the socioeconomic means to obtain doctoral degrees while other women, despite founding these programs, are let go. hooks adds that white women don’t acknowledge the academic work of Black women and are only interested in accessing upper-class status and wealth. hooks refers to this as “white power-feminism” (100). These privileged people link feminism with whiteness, which makes Black people dislike the feminist movement.
In response to this, hooks advocates for feminist thought. She criticizes Black men who call Black feminists race traitors, stating that it is privileged white women who reject the intersection of anti-sexist and anti-racist work. Some Black women, however, are also only interested in gaining more power within the capitalist patriarchy, rather than challenging the system. hooks refers again to The Coming of Black Genocide, which argues that the women’s liberation movement could have sabotaged white supremacy had it not become focused on whiteness and consumerism. hooks note that she wrote about this issue and other issues discussed in the collection, but the authors do not give her or other Black women credit.
hooks claims that white women who practice intersectional feminism need to raise their voices and use them to center the work of Black women. hooks quotes Mab Segrest who criticizes competition between women. hooks advocates for replacing competition with “a communal ethic of collective benefit” (105), arguing that it is competition that causes white women to not give Black women credit for their work in the feminist movement. hooks observes that the systems of sexism and racism have an “interlocking nature” and that both must be combated together (107).
The essays in this section mainly focus on Black Sexism and Misogyny. hooks cites various written sources, such as those by Alice Walker, Ida B. Wells, Malcolm X, and Karl Marx, as well as various movies and television programs. She discusses significant events in the US, such as the Clarence Thomas hearings and the war on poverty, alongside personal anecdotes. hooks argues that overcoming sexism is key to Overcoming Systemic White Supremacy.
In the first essay of this section, “Challenging Sexism,” hooks argues that while Black men fight against racism, they simultaneously perpetuate misogyny against Black women. hooks’s inclusion of quotes from various sources such as Paul Gilroy utilizes the rhetorical strategy of logos. While hooks generally agrees with Gilroy, she also quotes—and raises issues with—Adolf Hitler about the patriarchal family. This allows her to craft a counterargument about how families can operate around love rather than patriarchal control. The inclusion of the controversial quote also makes use of the rhetorical strategy pathos.
The next essay, “The Integrity of Black Womanhood,” focuses on negative depictions of Black women. As in the previous essay, hooks references political events from her day, such as the Thomas hearings and the war on poverty. She combines these with quotes from other written sources, including Ida B. Wells and the anthology Coming of Black Genocide, and visual media, such as the film Sankofa. The variety of sources that hooks uses in this essay adds nuance and authority to her claims. By referencing popular media like films alongside political events like the war on poverty, hooks lends credence to her claim that white supremacy is a pervasive and systemic phenomenon. Furthermore, by focusing on media sources, hooks reinforces the claim that racism exists not just in the form of overt prejudice or explicit violence, but also in the nuances of how Black people are portrayed in popular culture. hooks thereby conveys that, while phenomena like police brutality demonstrate the persistence of white supremacy, one can also see the pernicious effects of white supremacy in the way the media portrayed Anita Hill during Thomas’s confirmation hearing.
In the following essay, “Feminism,” hooks expands on the theme of Black Sexism and Misogyny by examining how Black men react to racism by being sexist against Black women. Her arguments in this essay are grounded in events and media from her time. In other words, hooks is timely in the mid-1990s and appeals to an audience familiar with current events. She cites some of the same authors in this essay as in previous essays, including Malcolm X and Alice Walker, developing a set of key figures that include both men and women. In the last essay of this section, “Revolutionary Feminism,” hooks discusses Solidarity and Betrayal between Black women and white women. To many Black women, “feminism continues to be seen as synonymous with bourgeois white women” (100). Upper-class white women created and promoted what hooks calls “white-power feminism” (102). She supports this claim with discussions of women’s studies programs and an ABC news program that silences the voices of women of color and promotes the voices of bourgeois white women. She also supports her claim by quoting and analyzing The Coming of Black Genocide and Mab Segrest. The authors of the former do not credit Black female authors for their ideas, which hooks argues exemplifies as a lack of solidarity. The latter source, Segrest, demonstrates solidarity, or “revolutionary interdependence” (106). hooks also discusses how Black women can betray one another. There is a division across class lines among Black women. She condemns “opportunistic black women primarily interested in gaining access to privilege within the existing structure” (102). These women work with the capitalist patriarchy, rather than Overcoming White Supremacy. hooks advocates for replacing competition with community to create the solidarity that is needed to overcome racism.
Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.
Including features:
By bell hooks
Class
View Collection
Class
View Collection
Colonialism & Postcolonialism
View Collection
Contemporary Books on Social Justice
View Collection
Essays & Speeches
View Collection
Feminist Reads
View Collection
Philosophy, Logic, & Ethics
View Collection
Politics & Government
View Collection
Sociology
View Collection