logo

51 pages 1 hour read

Hallowe'en Party

Fiction | Novel | Adult | Published in 1969

A modern alternative to SparkNotes and CliffsNotes, SuperSummary offers high-quality Study Guides with detailed chapter summaries and analysis of major themes, characters, and more.

Chapters 22-27Chapter Summaries & Analyses

Chapter 22 Summary

Poirot drives to The Elms to speak with Miss Emlyn. He asserts that they both know Joyce’s killer. He writes down four words and shows them to her; she agrees with two, claiming evidence that supports her opinion, but lacks evidence for the remaining two. Poirot refutes Mrs. Drake’s position from the previous chapter that Leopold, as a child, was not in control of his actions. Leopold’s desire for money, in Poirot’s eyes, led directly to his death. He asks for Miss Emlyn’s opinion of Nicholas and Desmond, whom she calls “trustworthy” if silly in “ephemeral things” (230).

Chapter 23 Summary

Elspeth speaks to Mrs. Cartwright, a local woman, at the grocery store. Mrs. Cartwright reports that diseased trees will be removed from Quarry Wood.

Mrs. Oliver receives a telegram ordering her to bring Mrs. Butler and Miranda to London immediately. Mrs. Butler demurs, but Mrs. Oliver insists, alarming Mrs. Butler. Miranda goes to say goodbye to a friend before they leave (later implied to be Michael Garfield). Mrs. Butler sadly muses that Joyce was her best friend, who used to tell Miranda “fantastic things about elephants and tigers” (235), connecting to Poirot’s hunch in Chapter 11 that Miranda wanted to have a story to equate to Joyce’s tales.

In London, Poirot meets with Spence, a public prosecutor, Chief Constable Alfred Richmond, and Inspector Timothy Raglan. The men are skeptical of Poirot’s claim (later revealed to be that Garfield and Mrs. Drake collaborated to murder Olga) until he produces proof of a real estate deal (later revealed as Garfield’s Greek Island purchase). Poirot adds that he will soon have a witness to confirm his story (revealed in Chapter 26 as Miranda). Poirot leaves, and the men debate whether the detective will prove correct or if his story is too improbable to be true.

Chapter 24 Summary

Mrs. Oliver and the Butlers stop on their way to London for lunch. While Miranda is away from the table, Mrs. Oliver comments on how little she knows her friend and how this is universal in relationships. Judith seeks Miranda, whose absence has been unexpectedly long.

Seargent Goodwin, a local officer, calls Elspeth seeking Spence. He reports that a body, presumed to be Olga’s, has been found in a well. The body’s wounds suggest she was stabbed to death.

Miranda waits until her mother leaves the restroom, then sneaks out of the restaurant to get in a man’s car (revealed in the next chapter to belong to Michael Garfield). She laughs at his disguise. They nearly get into a car accident with two young drivers (revealed in the next chapter as Nicholas and Desmond). The man reassures Miranda that Judith won’t have time to worry about her, as Miranda will soon be at her destination.

Mrs. Oliver calls Poirot to report Miranda’s disappearance. Mrs. Butler and Poirot plan to call the police; Poirot tells Mrs. Oliver about the body in the well.

Chapter 25 Summary

Miranda observes ancient megalithic stones at a site called Kilterbury Ring. The man (revealed in Chapter 26 to be Michael Garfield) claims the stones are for “ritual sacrifice,” which he asserts is not about “punishment.” Miranda worries that telling Joyce about witnessing a murder (per Chapter 26), led to Joyce’s death. She claims she wanted to meet Joyce’s (false) tales of India with an interesting story of her own. The man takes Miranda to the summit and encourages her to drink a “golden liquid.”

Suddenly, Nicholas and Desmond appear, knocking the drink from Miranda’s hands and seizing the knife the man was about to use to stab her. Miranda contends that coming here wasn’t an accident, but rather what she felt she deserved for causing Joyce’s death. Miranda is distraught to learn that Olga has been found in the “wishing well.”

Chapter 26 Summary

Raglan, Spence, Richmond, and the prosecutor meet with Poirot and Miranda. Miranda admits that she told Joyce she had seen a murder, but that she thinks Leopold overheard. She confirms that Joyce then repeated the story, but claimed it happened to her, not Miranda. Miranda recalls sitting in a tree when she saw a man and a woman carrying a body, a knife, and a bloody scarf. Miranda initially suspected that someone had died by suicide. She told no one, afraid she would be in trouble for spying.

During a second birdwatching incident, she heard the same people talking, this time about going to a Greek island. Miranda realized what she’d seen previously was murder. She identifies the speakers as Mrs. Drake and Michael, the latter of whom she loved intensely.

Chapter 27 Summary

Mrs. Oliver is impatient to hear the full explanation of Poirot’s solution, as she is shocked to learn of Mrs. Drake’s involvement. He explains that he sought someone who had gotten wet without explanation. He says Mrs. Drake dropped the vase while Miss Whittaker was watching to cover up how she’d actually gotten wet. Miss Whittaker told Miss Emlyn, who sent her to Poirot.

Joyce had not witnessed a crime herself, but Mrs. Drake had always suspected that she and Michael had been seen carrying Olga’s body. Once Poirot accepted the common refrain that Joyce lied frequently, he concluded that Miranda, her friend and a frequent wanderer in Quarry wood, was the true witness.

Poirot likens Mrs. Drake and Michael to Lady Macbeth and Narcissus from Shakespeare and Greek myth, respectively. He names Michael’s motivations as money and his obsession with creating a garden on a wild Greek island. When Michael failed to seduce Mrs. Llewellyn-Smythe, he turned to Mrs. Drake, her heir. Mrs. Llewellyn-Smythe discovered the affair and left the money to Olga as a result. Micheal did not marry Olga, because he believed the courts would rule against her even with the genuine codicil; he hired Lesley to forge the false codicil to ensure the courts overturned her claim and reverted the money to Mrs. Drake. Lesley and Olga were both killed to obscure this crime. Joyce and Leopold both claimed to know more than they did, which led Mrs. Drake and Michael to kill them.

Poirot likens Michael to Lucifer in the Christian tradition as both beautiful and excessively fond of beauty. Poirot notes Michael’s fondness for Miranda; Mrs. Butler confirms that Miranda was Michael’s daughter, as the two had an affair when Judith was young. Her supposed dead husband was invented to conceal that she had a child while unmarried. Poirot produces Michael’s sketch of Miranda, which he has titled “Iphigenia,” referencing a character from Greek myth who is sacrificed by her father.

When he failed to kill Miranda and get away with his crimes, Michael drank the poison he had intended for her. Poirot finds this fitting.

Chapters 22-27 Analysis

In the final portion of the novel, Poirot’s repeated interviews lead him to finally understand the ways all the different pieces of Woodleigh Common’s crimes across the years fit together. In Chapter 27, this culminates in the explanation scene, a common convention in detective fiction. In such scenes, the detective gathers all relevant parties together before explaining the logic that led them to the case’s solution. Such scenes usually involve assembling all the suspects in a case for a dramatic reveal of the killer. In Hallowe’en Party, Christie puts a twist on this convention by waiting until after one of the killers is already known to the reader before explaining all. By the time Poirot assembles police, Mrs. Oliver, Mrs. Butler, and Miranda, Miranda has already been saved from near-death at Michael’s hands. Michael himself is dead.

Christie’s plot also deviates from structural convention in that the action sequence that precedes the final reveal does not include either the main detective—Poirot—nor Mrs. Oliver in her role as assistant detective. Instead, Desmond and Nicholas—who spot Miranda driving off with a disguised Michael purely by chance—sneak behind the killer and his would-be victim before tackling Michael just as he is poised to strike. This gives Christie a way to include some action in a dialogue-heavy novel without putting her notoriously cerebral detective in an unlikely high-action situation. This reveal of Michael’s duplicity does not diminish the importance of Poirot’s reveal scene, as the convoluted backstory that led to Joyce’s murder involves many moving parts that only Poirot has been able to put together.

Christie utilizes both synchronicity and dialogue as methods of storytelling to help build suspense. Poirot, though the primary point-of-view character, has little internal narration that’s directly presented; most of the revelation in the text happens when Poirot speaks to other characters—conversations in which he is sometimes intentionally mysterious. Poirot frames this lack of forthrightness as stemming from a reluctance to reveal his suspicions before he has confirmed them, but it works in Christie’s favor, allowing her to drop clues without fully revealing their import. If characters grow frustrated with Poirot’s secretiveness, they have an analog in Mrs. Oliver, who tuts and sighs over Poirot’s refusal to explain his line of thinking before he is ready. Mrs. Oliver thus emerges as a stand-in for the reader, moved through the plot by the needs of the detective.

The novel’s resolution allows Christie to both uphold the novel’s views on The Value of Community Knowledge and reify the credibility and skill of Poirot. While the theories that Joyce was murdered as a result of an unspecified mental health condition or repressed sexual deviancy are refuted, Michael’s fanaticism about his garden and the pseudo-religious ceremony he sets up are likened to a form of “madness” by Poirot. This framing enables Christie to have both sides of a plotting issue—recognizing an element of “madness” in Michael’s crimes lets Poirot emerge as correct about the murder stemming from motive and correct in his assertion that when people widely agree on something, they are “usually right.” This doubly affirms Poirot’s intelligence; everyone is right, but Poirot is more right than everyone else.

blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
blurred text
Unlock IconUnlock all 51 pages of this Study Guide

Plus, gain access to 8,800+ more expert-written Study Guides.

Including features:

+ Mobile App
+ Printable PDF
+ Literary AI Tools